2022 IB Diploma Extended Essays
of mammograms
before and after
Comparison
As demonstrated in figure 8, the percentage of the highest 7-day average of SARS-CoV-2
cases over the total population is highest for the UK at 0.223%, followed by Switzerland and
then Belgium at 0.174% and 0.083% respectively. This provides more incentive for the UK
government to reallocate resources towards SARS-CoV-2 management as a higher
percentage of people are being infected by this virus. Countries under the Bismarck model
did not cease mammogram screenings, causing the percentage decrease in such screenings to
be significantly lower than that of the UK. This means that the NHS is not as effective in
allocating their resources during the global health crisis, whereas the Bismarck model results
in greater allocative efficiency during these times. In addition to not being able to efficiently
allocate England’s healthcare resources, there were insufficient resources to run all health
services. Due to the large percentage of the NHS being run by the government, the scarcity of
resources was probably a main contributing factor when determining the best method of
directing recourse (Daniel K Goyal, 2021).
Counterclaim
Although the Bismarck model presents a seemingly more efficient system than the NHS, a
measure of mammogram screenings may not be the most effective method of determining the
performance of such models during this pandemic. Other measurements of healthcare system
performance could be the percentage of funding provided by the government to try and match
the demand for health services by the public to counteract the scarcity of resources available.
The availability of resources and the severity of SARS-CoV-2 cases is unknown to the public
21
Made with FlippingBook. PDF to flipbook with ease